Thursday, June 02, 2005

Enlistment

So Kos is writing about the May armed forces recruitment figures, how they're so low that the Pentagon has delayed reporting them. I think what we're seeing is the product of actions taken by an administration very naive about the complexity of our volunteer army. When a huge demand is put on the armed forces, like that of two concurrent, extended conflicts in which an essentially police duty is expected beyond plain combat, there will be consequences. This would surely impact the general interest in serving, especially if the case made for one of said wars is shown to be somewhat misleading. And perhaps there wouldn't be so many problems if the administration had been more responsive to soldiers needs, like body armor and armored humvees. Rumsfeld says we go to war with the army we have; shouldn't we have considered what army we will have, if we were to jump into such a protracted conflict?

And they ran saying Democrats were naive about foreign policy. What a great time to be draft age.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree completely. At least I've got the best draft deferment there is: I'm garuanteed to go in.

The question I have is this: Did anyone not see this coming? Of course there was an elistment/enrollment [ROTC] spike after 9/11 (people who trained up just in time for Iraq), and of course, after a couple of years, that spike went away. Of course Iraq was going to take a long time. We were in Germany well over seven years after the end of the Second World War, and THERE WAS NO INSURGENCY to bog us down. This is not even taking into account the unpopularity of the Iraq war and its effects on enlistment. Anyone who didn't see this coming was either very shortsided or, in the words of Billy Mitchell, guilty "incopetency, criminal neglegence, and almost treasonable administration of the national defense."

To me it's a bit like WMD. I didn't think they were there, but I actually thought for a while that they must, because the Bush Administrationo was so adament. Similarly, I assumed they had to have a plan, both administrating Iraq, and maintianing force levels for a protracted conflict, because they bet so much on it. Obviously I was wrong. To quote the www.bushyoga.com SofU video remix, evidently "trusting in the sanity and restaint of the United States is not a plan, and it is not an option."

-DVB

June 3, 2005 at 5:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home